Jump to content
Micha!

Map opinion

Map opinion  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Which side you want to play?



Recommended Posts

Hey, I started to make the map "Minas Tirith" for Stronghold Crusader 2 and I would like to hear your opinion if you want to play the attacking or defending side? :)

I prefer the defending side because I could create a huge army to attack but same time I have worries that the KI might be to easy (stupid attacking). Maybe it might be better to make it skirmish and for 2 or 3 players? (1 defending, 2 attacking)

 

 

First concept of the map. Textures, walls, ways, etc are not ready.

SHC2_Minas_Tirith.jpg

Edited by Micha!

TeamMuppet.eu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote for defending - because there are far more attackers than defenders and it will be much more of a challenge.

 

Regarding skirmish/non-skirmish: How about creating a map for each type and then you can request play testers to see which is better?

Edited by Lord_Chris

Quote

The fields have eyes, and the woods have ears.

⁠— Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales: The Knight's Tale

Useful Articles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks very good!

 

I do have one thing to say though: Why is there the wall around the fields? In the real Minas Tirith, it was just the edge of Osgiliath and then open fields until the gate of Minas Tirith.


Quote

The fields have eyes, and the woods have ears.

⁠— Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales: The Knight's Tale

Useful Articles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted defending, simply because I am someone who likes to focus on defence a lot. The map itself looks brilliant, but the point Chris made does make me wonder also about the theme.


"Gofyn wyf am galon hapus, calon onest, calon l?n."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I didn't actually know that - I do think it would look better without the outer wall though, I don't feel it looks right, but maybe after it's done it will look better.

 

I am definitely looking forward to seeing it completed, though. :)


Quote

The fields have eyes, and the woods have ears.

⁠— Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales: The Knight's Tale

Useful Articles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Map is nearly finished. I need a test person to see if it's possible to play with 2 people. The siege units always team up with the KI so I want to see what happens with 2 human players.

Add me in Steam if you want to help testing the map: Micha! or micha201289

 

*EDIT* I think the map is fine to be released. I sent a request to the download section.

 

Steam text:

 

Greetings Lords,

after two days of "work" I managed to create a "Minas Tirith" looking map. I made it to be played as defending or attacking side. Also it is possible to choose between a KI or a human player to play against. It's not a 100% copy of the original but should be good enough.

I already played a couple matches on it and it's quite fun to do so. Unfortunately, it wasn't possible to add more unit groups because the game started to stutter (first try were 1200 units). The units will come in waves starting at day 3 till 25. The goal as defender is to survive the invasion and after that to kill the Lord at the River.

 

!! important !! : The "host" must be the defending side, else the invasion groups will swap over. It's not possible to play the attacking side against a KI player (I couldn't manage to make this possible).

 

 

Map size: extra large

 

Screenshots:

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=332466802

http://mnwa.bplaced.net/ftpfiles/screenshots/SHC2_Minas_Tirith.jpg

 

Download: http://uploaded.net/file/yq5iqngv

 

Locate (example): C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\SteamApps\common\Stronghold Crusader 2\assets\maps

 

Guide line for map design: http://www.skrippy.com/user_upload/5570/9021.jpg

Thank you for that :)

Edited by Micha!

TeamMuppet.eu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I'm in the Steam group "Stronghold Crusaders 2 - World Builders" but badly it hasn't much activity.


TeamMuppet.eu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A very nice map, Micha!

 

You got a really nice comment on the FireFly Twitter page for it some days ago:

"Huge praise in the office this morning for Micha in the forums, who created Minas Tirith in the Crusader 2 Map Editor"

 

And I see that they are also now also featuring a video you made with Sergiu.

 

Great stuff :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. Got much compliments and got featued. To bad some people can't play the map because of lags.

I would have loved to add more content and details (stones, oasis, etc) but I thought it may increase the lags for some people.

 

Next will be to make a 2vs2 version to play it on coop. :)


TeamMuppet.eu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job! Nice to see you've included Rammas Echor and the dockyard. Makes a Tolkien fan, like me, proud. :)

 

I think it would be better to have the player defend, since I think it is harder to balance a map intended for an attacking player. Usually, in that case, there is only one weakness to the castle, allowing little replay-ability. While the AI may attack in the same few patterns, the player can at least experiment with different defensive strategies.


Mqb938i.png

Do you crave a life of adventure? Check out our Adventures in the Duchy of Riverborne and apply here to join the action!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Micha, I have been wondering. Could this map be played as a 2v1?

With the defending 2 players using the new co-operative feature of 2 Lord in 1 castle?

 

Would be fun if it did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Micha, I have been wondering. Could this map be played as a 2v1?

With the defending 2 players using the new co-operative feature of 2 Lord in 1 castle?

 

Would be fun if it did.

 

Not yet, but I am working on a 2vs2 verison of the map. The 2vs2 version will have different units waves then the 1vs1 version. I wanted to wait for more feedback coming in for the map.


TeamMuppet.eu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Topics

    • Your opinion of rats, gong, and criminals in Stronghold 2?

      I am making this thread for you to tell us what is your opinion about those three stuff. Some of us don't like it, some of us do, and those of us who don't like it - they may avoid to play the whole game because of that fact. I am one of those who didn't like it much, and who wanted Stronghold 2 to be at least a little bit more simplified, but now I do like it! I believe one can easily build falconers post and gong pit to solve the issue with gong, which is a quite natural problem in a medieval

      in Stronghold 2

    • A castle builders opinion

      As I intend to upload several castles more I should introduce myself a little bit more. I know stronghold since 2004 and Idesigned since this time lots oc castles, I don?t remember how many. But I hadn`t had Internet for a long time, and I wasn`t interested in uploading too. I am primarily a castle builder, less a strategist. Hence, the scripts were rather weak just at the beginning. I still use Stronghold 1, just because I am a castle builder. The old play enables to combine all elements u

      in Stronghold 1

    • Your opinion about the download comment system

      While I'm busy refining the download section, I'm wondering whether to remove the comment system, most of the files that have discussion have threads here anyway, and you would be able to rate a download without writing a comment. In my opinion, all it's doing is slowing the page down, but I'd like to hear what other members of the community think before just removing it.   So, what is everyone else's opinion about removing the comment system and just have a simple rate system like the articles,

      in Site Questions and Support

×
×
  • Create New...